From reid@math.berkeley.edu Wed Jan 22 02:29:03 1992 Return-Path: Received: from math.berkeley.edu ([128.32.183.94]) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA24953; Wed, 22 Jan 92 02:29:03 EST Received: from skippy.berkeley.edu.berkeley.edu by math.berkeley.edu (4.1/1.33(math)) id AA03361; Tue, 21 Jan 92 23:27:28 PST Date: Tue, 21 Jan 92 23:27:28 PST From: reid@math.berkeley.edu (michael reid) Message-Id: <9201220727.AA03361@math.berkeley.edu> To: cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu Subject: Re: Rubik's cube dice tops (Spoiler) Cc: ronnie@cisco.com a while ago (last month), Dan (hoey@aic.nrl.navy.mil) writes: > Last week ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie Kon) challenged us to find Rubik's > cube patterns with dice pips for 1, 2, and 3 on the three pairs of > opposite sides. He claimed it could be done in fourteen HST, where > one HST is a turn of a face or center slice by 90 or 180 degrees. I > responded that it could be done in thirteen HST. Here is how. I will > use this opportunity to practice the enhanced Varga Rubiksong I > described (unfortunately with many typos) on 22 Feb 90. > The (only such) pattern is the composition of Four-Spot and Laughter. > We have long known the processes [ description deleted ] > This uses only 13 HST. This is also the shortest process I know of in > the normal metric: 18 QT, which is not so bad for the combination of here's a shorter way. in the "flubrd" notation, use: D' F^2 R U^2 F^2 B^2 D^2 R^2 L' F^2 U' D^2 which is 11 "HST" (which i call "slice turns"). this is also 12 "face" turns, but 20 quarter turns. this can also be done in only 14 quarter turns as follows: F^2 U D F B U D F B U D F B' (*) note that this can easily be obtained from the well-known manuever for "laughter": ( F B C_U )^6 (**) where C_ means "turn the whole cube" (as in Bandelow's book). note that this manuever reorients the cube. then manuever (*) is just the "flubrd" translation of the manuever M_F (**) M_F' (without the cube reorientation), where M_ means "turn the middle slice," again, as in Bandelow's book. here's a question for those out there with 5x5x5 cubes: have you noticed that the stickers seem to be more happy on the floor than on the facelets of the cube? the more i use my cube, the more restless they seem to become. does anyone know of a good cure for this? i'm thinking of taking them all off, cleaning off the glue (or gum or whatnot) and gluing them back on, using a stronger glue. anyone have any suggestions for what kind of glue? i'll let you know how my experiment works. mike