From tomgm@physics.purdue.edu Thu Jul 29 11:02:30 1993 Return-Path: Received: from bohr.physics.purdue.edu by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for /com/archive/cube-lovers id AA26047; Thu, 29 Jul 93 11:02:30 EDT Received: by bohr.physics.purdue.edu (5.65/2.7) id AA21974; Thu, 29 Jul 93 10:05:22 -0500 Message-Id: <9307291505.AA21974@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> From: Tom G. Miller Subject: Re: Hint wanted for 4x4x4 To: ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie B. Kon) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 93 10:05:22 EST Cc: Cube-Lovers@life.ai.mit.edu In-Reply-To: <199307282337.AA06770@lager.cisco.com>; from "Ronnie B. Kon" at Jul 28, 93 4:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] Ronnie, It's been so long since I've messed around with my 4x4x4 that I can't answer your question directly, however when I see descriptions for the method in which people solve the 4x4x4 it is usually different from the way I first solved it: What I did was to pair up the middle two edgies, and the four central face cubes. There are few enough restraints that this is not too hard to do for someone who has never touched a 4x4x4 cube. One then has a cube like with faces similar to the following: r b b g y o o b y o o b r y y w One can then "pretend" it is a 3x3x3 cube and then solve it. Unfortunately you will occasionally end up in an orbit of the "pseudo-3x3x3" that is impossible to solve. Oh well... scramble it and try it again. Using this technique I was able to solve a scrambled 4x4x4 cube within an hour or so of when I set my hands on one. Needless to say, this is NOT a good technique for solving a 4x4x4 cube if one is interested only in the 4x4x4. In fact I suspect it is a pretty awful algorithm, especially since you frequently end up in an unsolveable orbit using your standard 3x3x3 techniques. But it is a useful trick for maximizing the hard work one used in learning the 3x3x3. As most people who have a 4x4x4 realize, if you never make any twists of a solved 4x4x4 cube except along the center, you of course have a 2x2x2. And as I described, if you only make moves 1-deep, it is equivalent to a 3x3x3, and of course it is also a 4x4x4. Tom Miller tomgm@physics.purdue.edu