From @mail.uunet.ca:mark.longridge@canrem.com  Wed Dec 15 13:04:34 1993
Return-Path: <@mail.uunet.ca:mark.longridge@canrem.com>
Received: from mail.uunet.ca (uunet.ca) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for /com/archive/cube-lovers id AA25770; Wed, 15 Dec 93 13:04:34 EST
Received: from portnoy.canrem.com ([198.133.42.251]) by mail.uunet.ca with SMTP id <55713(9)>; Wed, 15 Dec 1993 11:01:33 -0500
Received: from canrem.com by portnoy.canrem.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA20478; Wed, 15 Dec 93 11:00:22 EST
Received: by canrem.com (PCB-UUCP 1.1f)
	id 18E5F0; Wed, 15 Dec 93 10:58:09 -0400
To: cube-lovers@life.ai.mit.edu
Reply-To: CRSO.Cube@canrem.com
Sender: CRSO.Cube@canrem.com
Subject: Part 2
From: mark.longridge@canrem.com (Mark Longridge)
Message-Id: <60.620.5834.0C18E5F0@canrem.com>
Date: 	Wed, 15 Dec 1993 09:58:00 -0500
Organization: CRS Online  (Toronto, Ontario)

Hmmmm, a little inconsistent (sp?) with the notation there.
I usually only use U when quoting the processes of others.

I'm going to try tackling the 1152-fold symmetry idea
later tonight.

When looking for CD-type processes I find it helps to think
in terms of distinct states you pass through in approaching
the goal state. Sort of like factoring a composite pattern
into simpler ones you add together.

Rotating the cube in space definitely helps too.

-> Mark