From dik@cwi.nl Sun Jan 8 19:12:24 1995 Return-Path: Received: from charon.cwi.nl by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for /com/archive/cube-lovers id AA18508; Sun, 8 Jan 95 19:12:24 EST Received: from boring.cwi.nl by charon.cwi.nl with SMTP id ; Mon, 9 Jan 1995 01:12:17 +0100 Received: by boring.cwi.nl id ; Mon, 9 Jan 1995 01:12:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 01:12:17 +0100 From: Dik.Winter@cwi.nl Message-Id: <9501090012.AA02894=dik@boring.cwi.nl> To: cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu, mreid@ptc.com Subject: Re: two stage filtration > this is true. i decided i was more interested in performance than > in knowing about local maxima. > > I will try to verify phase 2 later next week. > let me offer a suggestion here. since i divided the corner configurations > by symmetry, it might be nicer if you divide the U-D edge configurations > by symmetry. (the numbers involved are the same.) I will see how I divide it now, but I can change easily. My biggest change is to weed out parity. I just realized that, but that is the reason it will not fit now. Moreover, I will go completely forward to get also local maxima. I do not know yet what to do about the quarter turn version. I never put that in my program for this phase. I had some form of quarter turn version, but only for U and D. I will see, dik