From mreid@ptc.com Thu Feb 16 09:48:16 1995 Return-Path: Received: from ptc.com (poster.ptc.com) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for /com/archive/cube-lovers id AA04895; Thu, 16 Feb 95 09:48:16 EST Received: from ducie by ptc.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4-NN) id AA20708; Thu, 16 Feb 95 09:46:37 EST Received: by ducie (1.38.193.4/sendmail.28-May-87) id AA08579; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 10:01:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 10:01:11 -0500 From: mreid@ptc.com (michael reid) Message-Id: <9502161501.AA08579@ducie> To: cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu, bryan@wvnvm.wvnet.edu Subject: superflip composed with pons asinorum Content-Length: 807 jerry asks > have you tried your Kociemba's > algorithm programs for the composition of Pons Asinorum with > superflip? after superflip, this is probably the second most likely candidate for an antipode. there are only 4 positions which are fixed by all 48 symmetries of the cube. they are: start, superflip, pons asinorum, and the composition of superflip and pons asinorum. obviously start is of no interest and neither is pons asinorum. my quarter turn version found this in less than one minute: B3 L1 D1 L1 F3 U3 D3 L1 B3 D3 F3 R1 L3 F3 U1 D1 L2 U1 D1 B2 22q, 20f so this position is at least as close to start as superflip. i've tested (but not yet extensively) all the local maxima given by hoey and saxe. i'll give a report on these some time soon. mike